Thanks! Definitely, actors and fibers can co-exist. However, fibers are the lower-level primitive on top of which actors can be implemented, not a replacement for actors as a concurrency tool, which was what I was trying to argue int he article.

Replacting `IO` with "monad" would be too general, as there are many monads which do not describe side-effectful computations, and have vastly different use-cases than `Future`s or fibers.

--

--

--

Software engineer, Functional Programming and Scala enthusiast, SoftwareMill co-founder

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Adam Warski

Adam Warski

Software engineer, Functional Programming and Scala enthusiast, SoftwareMill co-founder

More from Medium

Functors with Scala & Cats 🐱​

Last Minute Seattle Seahawks Mock Draft

A Transliteration Scheme for Abjad Pegon